Drawing for YOU'RE ON

USPTO serial 78720335

YOU'RE ON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YOU'RE ON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lavatus Powell

Lavatus Powell VIACOM INTERNATIONAL INC.C/O ANTHONY ORTIZ 1515 BROADWAY 51ST FLONEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Communications services, namely, transmitting sound and audio-visual recordings via mobile communications devices; telecommunications services, namely, electronic transmission of voice, data, images and audio and video files to mobile communications devices; audio and video broadcasting; television broadcasting services via cable, satellite and other means; cable radio broadcasting and transmission; mobile radio communication; radio broadcasting; radio communicationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 2, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 2, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 28, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 15, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 15, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 15, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 2, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 10, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 20, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance