Drawing for RACKRADAR

USPTO serial 78720383

RACKRADAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RACKRADAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas P. Howard

Thomas P. Howard Garlin Driscoll Howard, LLC245 Century Cir Ste 101Louisville, CO 80027UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Radar detectors; Radar object detectors for use on vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 12, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 21, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 17, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 17, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 17, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 15, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2007UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Sep 19, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 19, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 9, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 9, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 20, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance