Drawing for EVERY KID'S A WINNER!

USPTO serial 78722071

EVERY KID'S A WINNER!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVERY KID'S A WINNER!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

S. Roxanne Edwards

S. Roxanne Edwards BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP2001 ROSS AVENUE2300 TRAMMELL CROW CENTERDALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Promotional game pieces and game materialsACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, provision of children's play areas at restaurants; providing amusement arcades with arcade games, amusement arcade rides, and video and coin operated games; and live theatrical performances featuring live and electronically animated charactersACTIVE—
043Restaurant servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 14, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 9, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 9, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 19, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance