Drawing for GREASE LIFTER

USPTO serial 78722288

GREASE LIFTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3386435Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 19, 2008
Examiner
COWARD, JEFFERY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREASE LIFTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sean W. Dwyer

QVC INCSTUDIO PARKWEST CHESTER, PA 19380UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003All-purpose cleanersSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDNov 30, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2014C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Sep 19, 2014CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 19, 2014CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Apr 9, 2014PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 23, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 14, 2008REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Nov 13, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 29, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 29, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 30, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 30, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 31, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 8, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 26, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2006GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance