Drawing for FOOD360º FULL-CHAIN VIEW. FULL CIRCLE COMMUNICATION.

USPTO serial 78722518

FOOD360º FULL-CHAIN VIEW. FULL CIRCLE COMMUNICATION.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOOD360º FULL-CHAIN VIEW. FULL CIRCLE COMMUNICATION.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie Nichols Matthews

Julie Nichols Matthews Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon LLP225 West Wacker DriveSuite 2800Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing online business information in the field of food sales; and providing online marketing research information in the field of food consumptionACTIVE—
041Publication of magazines dealing with a wide variety of subjects relating to food production, sale and consumptionACTIVE—
042Providing online information in the field of food production, namely, agricultural research and research on food supply security issuesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 5, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 5, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 24, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 24, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 24, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 25, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 25, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 6, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 26, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 16, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 15, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance