USPTO serial 78722876
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TBS, INC., LEGAL DEPT., TRADEMARK GROUP
M FRANKLIN R MCMURTRY B PLOSKER TBS, INC LEGAL DEPT TRADEMARK GROUPC/O TURNER BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC ON13 NATLANTA, GA 30303| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOYS AND SPORTING GOODS INCLUDING GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, ACTION FIGURES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR, PLUSH TOYS, BALLOONS, BATHTUB TOYS, RIDE-ON TOYS, PLAYING CARDS, EQUIPMENT SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING CARD GAMES, TOY VEHICLES, DOLLS, FLYING DISCS, ELECTRONIC HAND-HELD GAME UNIT, GAME EQUIPMENT SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING A BOARD GAME, A MANIPULATIVE GAME, A PARLOR GAME AND AN ACTION TYPE TARGET GAME, STAND ALONE VIDEO OUTPUT GAME MACHINES, JIGSAW AND MANIPULATIVE PUZZLES, PAPER FACE MASKS, SKATEBOARDS, ICE SKATES, WATER SQUIRTING TOYS, BALLS, NAMELY, PLAYGROUND BALLS, SOCCER BALLS, BASEBALLS, BASKETBALLS, BASEBALL GLOVES, SWIMMING FLOATS FOR RECREATIONAL USE, KICK BOARD FLOTATION DEVICES FOR RECREATIONAL USE, SURFBOARDS, SWIM BOARDS FOR RECREATIONAL USE, SWIM FINS, TOY BAKEWARE AND TOY COOKWARE, TOY BANKS, AND CHRISTMAS TREE ORNAMENTS, NOT BEING ILLUMINATED AND NOT BEING MADE OF CONFECTIONERY | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 10, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 1, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |