Drawing for GIRL WITH THE MOST

USPTO serial 78725803

GIRL WITH THE MOST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GIRL WITH THE MOST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sujata Chaudhri

WILLIAM M BORCHARD ARTHUR J GREENBAUM COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003COSMETICSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 14, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 14, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 9, 2007LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Jan 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance