Drawing for PYTHON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS

USPTO serial 78726073

PYTHON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAN, AMY C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PYTHON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN D. HANCOCK

325 E WARM SPRINGS RD SUITE 200LAS VEGAS, NV 89119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038providing voice communication services via the InternetACTIVE—
042computer programming for others in the field of wireless communications and Internet-based voice communicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 18, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 18, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 21, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 29, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2008PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Aug 27, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 18, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 29, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 28, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 15, 2008IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2008INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Jun 26, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 19, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 13, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 16, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 22, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 21, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 26, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 10, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 26, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 4, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 17, 2006CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 17, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance