Drawing for VINE TAGS

USPTO serial 78726187

VINE TAGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VINE TAGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott J. Fields

SCOTT J FIELDSNATIONAL IP RIGHTS CTR550 TOWNSHIP LINE RD STE 400BLUE BELL, PA 19422-2726

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016greeting cards to be used with bottles of wineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jan 2, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 5, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 4, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 4, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 11, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance