Drawing for ETHANOL EXPRESS

USPTO serial 78726414

ETHANOL EXPRESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ETHANOL EXPRESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Troy Leonard

TROY LEONARD WOODS, FULLER, SHULTZ & SMITH PC300 S PHILLIPS AVE STE 300SIOUX FALLS, SD 57104-6322UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Ethanol and ethanol production servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 17, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance