Drawing for HOMETOWN OXYGEN

USPTO serial 78726864

HOMETOWN OXYGEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOMETOWN OXYGEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Neuberger Weller, Esq.

SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER ESQ MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY &701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Home health care servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 11, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 8, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 20, 2007GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 29, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 29, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 29, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 29, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 27, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 6, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance