USPTO serial 78727105
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gilbert Lee Sandler
GILBERT LEE SANDLER SANDLER, TRAVIS & ROSENBERG PA5200 BLUE LAGOON DR STE 600MIAMI, FL 33126-7002UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Computer education training; Computer education training services; Training in the use and operation of computers, networks, hardware components, software, computer systems; Training services in the field of technology, computer systems, computer network, computer software, computer hardware | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2005 |
| 042 | Computer consultation; Computer network design for others; Computer site design; Consultation services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Design and development of networks; Design and maintenance of computer sites for third parties; Design for others in the field of education and technology; Information technology consultation; Installation of computer software; Technology consultation in the field of education | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |