Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78728152?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78728152. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns THE GREAT BLONDIE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78728152, the listed owner(s) include: GREYSTON BAKERY INC..

What is USPTO serial number 78728152?

Serial number 78728152 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark THE GREAT BLONDIE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of THE GREAT BLONDIE?

THE GREAT BLONDIE (78728152) currently shows USPTO status code 614 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover THE GREAT BLONDIE?

The public record lists International Classes: 030. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78728152

THE GREAT BLONDIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614

Filing date: Oct 6, 2005
Status date: Mar 18, 2008
Registration date: —
Examiner: STEIN, JAMES W
Law office: PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE GREAT BLONDIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

GREYSTON BAKERY INC.
Yonkers, NY
Other trademarks owned by GREYSTON BAKERY INC.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Baker

Stephen L. Baker Baker and Rannells575 Route 28Suite 102Raritan, NJ 08869

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
030	Bakery products; Cakes; Cookies	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Mar 18, 2008	PETD	PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED	—
Dec 4, 2007	PINM	INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED	—
Nov 14, 2007	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
Nov 2, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 31, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 31, 2007	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Oct 31, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2007	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Sep 7, 2007	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 7, 2007	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 13, 2007	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Jan 27, 2007	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 10, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jan 9, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 8, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2007	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Jan 8, 2007	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Nov 7, 2006	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 7, 2006	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 11, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Oct 11, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—