USPTO serial 78728163
PLATFORM ENTERPRISE GRID ORCHESTRATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLATFORM ENTERPRISE GRID ORCHESTRATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Davis
DAVID J DAVIS BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP130 E RANDOLPH ST FL 3500CHICAGO, IL 60601-6314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software which supports a wide spectrum of business applications being run across a virtualized infrastructure by enabling the applications to request and use resources from a shared resource pool and which can be configured according to user defined business policies, which software can support most application types either directly or through application programming interfaces;software upon which various applications and services can be enabled to use the resources of many separate computers connected by a network, any scalable application that is able to make use of additional resources; software which can be configured through adaptive policies to conform to the end user's environment to allow an end user to specify how specific resources are to be used based on operational requirements; software which dynamically coordinates resources through its resource co-ordination and management capabilities and/or based on user defined policies and can be extended from servers to storage, license management and networks | ACTIVE | Jun 19, 2005 |
| 035 | Management and business consulting services in the field of software which supports a wide spectrum of business applications being run across a virtualized infrastructure and which can be configured according to user defined business policies, which software can support most application types either directly or through application programming interfaces; Management and business consulting in the field of software upon which various applications and services can be enabled to use the resources of many separate computers connected by a network;Management and business consulting services in the field of software which can be configured through adaptive policies to conform to the end user's environment; Management and business consulting services in the field of software which coordinates resources and can be extended from servers to storage, license management and networks | ACTIVE | Jun 19, 2005 |
| 042 | Maintenance and technical support services in association with software which supports a wide spectrum of business applications being run across a finalized infrastructure and which can be configured according to user defined business policies, which software can support most application types either directly or through application programming interfaces; maintenance and technical support services in association with software upon which various applications and services can be enabled to use the resources of many separate computers connected by a network,maintenance and technical support services in association with software which can be configured through adaptive policies to conform to the end user's environment, maintenance and technical support services in association with software which coordinates resources and can be extended from servers to storage, license management and networks; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others in association with software which supports a wide spectrum of business applications being run across a visualized infrastructure and which can be configured according to user defined businesspolicies, which software can support most application types either directly or through application programming interfaces, software upon which various applications and services can be enabled to use the resources of many separate computers connected by a network, software which can be configured through adaptive policies to conform to the end user's environment, and software which coordinates resources and can be extended from servers to storage, license management and networks | ACTIVE | Jun 19, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Platform Computing Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PLATFORM ENTERPRISE GRID ORCHESTRATOR
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |