Drawing for ENVIRO-KLEEN

USPTO serial 78728178

ENVIRO-KLEEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHENG, CHI TANG P
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENVIRO-KLEEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Renee S. Rutkowski

RENEE S RUTKOWSKI LOW & LOWPO BOX 2184ARLINGTON, VA 22202-0184UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003All-purpose cleaners; Degreasing preparations for INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL USE AND DEODORIZERACTIVEJul 13, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 16, 2007PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 19, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 13, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 17, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance