Drawing for RIGEL

USPTO serial 78728254

RIGEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RIGEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eunice P. de Carvalho

Natalie Hanlon-Leh FAEGRE & BENSON LLP1700 Lincoln Street3200 Wells Fargo CenterDenver, CO 80203-4532

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001fertilizers for ornamental, turf, domestic, commercial and agricultural useABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 15, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 15, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 30, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 17, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 14, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance