USPTO serial 78728761
TANNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TANNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mumbai - 400 009, IN
Mumbai - 400 009, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie Bertagnolli
Leslie Bertagnolli BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP130 E. Randolph Drive, Suite 3500One Prudential PlazaCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Alloys of common metal, namely, aluminum, ferrotitanium, German silver, titanium; box fasteners and bins of metal; non-electric non-hydraulic metal door closers, door openers, door springs; ceiling panels, floor panels, all of metal; metal bird bath structures; door frames, all of metal; stair treads and steps and staircases all of metal; fences, gates and gate stops, and guard rails, all of metal; tubes and tubing of metal; and metal frames for windows | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |