Drawing for AEROMOBILE AIRBORNE MOBILE CONNECTIVITY

USPTO serial 78729665

AEROMOBILE AIRBORNE MOBILE CONNECTIVITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AEROMOBILE AIRBORNE MOBILE CONNECTIVITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher Kelly

Christopher Kelly Wiley Rein LLP1776 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-2304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing wireless telecommunications services to passengers in flight, namely providing transmission of voice, data, graphics, images, audio, video and information via telephone and satellite transmissions; providing telecommunications connections to the Internet in flightACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 8, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 17, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 17, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 22, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 7, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 9, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 9, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 24, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 1, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance