Drawing for 1 ONE IP VOICE

USPTO serial 78730046

1 ONE IP VOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 1 ONE IP VOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott K. Haight

Scott K. Haight Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC165 Madison Avenue, Suite 2000Memphis, TN 38103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Hosted voice and data services in the nature of electronic, electric and digital transmission of voice and data.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 8, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 15, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 15, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 27, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 21, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 24, 2006GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Apr 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance