USPTO serial 78731045
VI DEL MAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VI DEL MAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Charlotte, NC
Charlotte, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day
Ursula B. Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, wine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |