USPTO serial 78731195
POWERING THE NEXT WAVE OF GROWTH IN WIRELESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWERING THE NEXT WAVE OF GROWTH IN WIRELESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah S. Shepherd
DEBORAH S SHEPHERD KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-7216UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Antenna brackets made of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Antennas; Tower mounted antennas; Tilting modules for antennas; Converters; Master control units for antennas; Electrical power distribution units; Current injectors for antenna and base station systems; Filters for antenna systems; Base stations comprised of boosters, radio frequency power amplifiers for use in wireless communications, filters, power transceivers, current injectors and combiners; Radio frequency power amplifiers for use in wireless communications; Base station conditioners for base station systems; Integrated radios; Digital radio heads; Base station filters and microwave filters for base station systems; Radio frequency couplers; Combiners for base station systems that compress noise and signals; Diplexers, namely, diplex filters for antenna systems; Triplexes, namely, filters for antenna systems; Boosters for antenna systems and base station systems; Repeaters for antenna systems and base station systems; Repeater networks for wireless communications; Wireband radio heads; Distributed antenna systems comprised of optical and radio frequency conversion modules, repeaters, wide band radio heads, antennas, and amplifiers; Base station sub-systems comprising of filters, couplers, and radio frequency power amplifiers for use in wireless communications; Cabinets and frames for radio frequency power amplifiers for use in wireless communications; Microwave radio links; Antenna line devices, namely, antennas, tower mounted amplifiers, tilting modules, converters, master control units, couplers, diplexers, and triplexers; Wireless IP and voice transmission systems comprised of antenna systems, namely, an antenna, tower mounted amplifier, tilting modules, converters, a master control unit, couplers, diplexers, and triplexers, and base station systems, namely, boosters, radio frequency power amplifiers for use in wireless communications, filters, power transceivers, current injectors and combiners; Computer software for use in controlling, operating, managing, or maintaining wireless communications systems or wireless infrastructure equipment; Antenna systems, namely, an antenna, tower mounted amplifier, tilting modules, converters, a master control unit, couplers, diplexers, and triplexers; Base station systems comprised of boosters, radio frequency power amplifiers for use in wireless communications, filters, power transceivers, current injectors and combiners; Wireless coverage systems, namely, antenna systems comprised of an antenna, tower mounted amplifier, tilting modules, converters, a master control unit, couplers, diplexers, and triplexers, and base station systems comprised of boosters, radio frequency power amplifiers for use in wireless communications, filters power transceivers, current injectors and combiners; Wireless data communication devices, namely, antenna systems comprised of an antenna, tower mounted amplifier, tilting modules, converters, a master control unit, couplers, diplexers, and triplexers and base station systems comprised of boosters, radio frequency power amplifiers for use in wireless communications, filters, power transceivers, current injectors and combiners; Wireless Infrastructure systems, namely, antenna systems comprised of an antenna, tower mounted amplifier, tilting modules, converters, a master control unit, couplers, diplexers, and triplexers and base station systems comprised of boosters, radio frequency power amplifiers for use in wireless communications, filters, power transceivers, current injectors and combiners; Wireless communications devices, namely, antenna systems comprised of an antenna, tower mounted amplifier, tilting modules, converters, a master control unit, couplers, diplexers, and triplexers and base station systems comprised of boosters, radio frequency power amplifiers for use in wireless communications, filters, power transceivers, current injectors and combiners | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation and maintenance of antenna systems and base station systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, development, and technical support of end-to-end wireless infrastructure systems and wireless communication systems, namely, antenna systems and base station systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named POWERING THE NEXT WAVE OF GROWTH IN WIRELESS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |