Drawing for BEE CHARMER

USPTO serial 78731265

BEE CHARMER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEE CHARMER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arturo Perez-Guerrero

ARTURO PEREZ-GUERRERO LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO PEREZ-GUERREROP.O.BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Antibacterial skin soaps; Bath gels; Bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetics; Essential oils; Hair care creams; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hand lotions; Hand soaps; Liquid bath soaps; Liquid soaps for hands, face and body; Perfumery; Skin soap; Soaps for body care; Soaps for personal useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 8, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 13, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 24, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance