USPTO serial 78731514
NCOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NCOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James F. Boyle
James F. Boyle Boyle Fredrickson, S.C.840 N. Plankinton AvenueMilwaukee, WI 53203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for machine interface prototyping and real-time simulation development tools used primarily in the aerospace, defense and automotive fields | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 7, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2009 | ZZBX | ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-INADVERTENTLY ISSUED ACTION | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |