USPTO serial 78731853
FARM GIRL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FARM GIRL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen R. Bergerson
Stephen R. Bergerson FREDRIKSON & BYRON, P.A.200 South Sixth StreetSuite 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Fragrances and personal care products, namely, colognes, perfumes, eau de perfume, eau de toilette and after-shave lotions; cosmetics and skin and body care products, namely, toners, skin lotions, lip balms, skin creams, body oils, skin cleansers, skin conditioners, skin moisturizers, skin emollients, body sprays, body scrubs, face scrubs, body powders, body masks, face masks, soaps, bath foams, bath gels, personal care products, namely, antiperspirants for personal use, bath oil, bath salts, body scrub, body wash bubble bath, cologne, deodorants for personal use; preparations for the skin, namely, skin lotions; hair care preparations, lip balm, massage lotion, nail care preparations, non-medicated cleanser for the face, shaving cream, shaving gels, after shave gels, after shave lotions, shower cream, shower gel and soaps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 2, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |