Drawing for NAKED LION

USPTO serial 78732517

NAKED LION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3353688Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 11, 2007
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAKED LION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cara R. Baer

NAKED LION BREWING COMPANY7881 ELM LEAFMEMPHIS, TN 38138UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beers, ales and brewed malt-based alcoholic beverage in the nature of a beerSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDMay 1, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2013C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Aug 14, 2013CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 9, 2013CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Apr 1, 2013PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 11, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 5, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Oct 2, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 17, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 17, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 19, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 27, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 21, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 21, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance