Drawing for SNACK HOURS

USPTO serial 78732592

SNACK HOURS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3178788Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 28, 2006
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with SNACK HOURS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L Welch

John L Welch Wolf Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.600 Atlantic AvenueBoston, MA 02210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Carry-out restaurants; Restaurant servicesACTIVESep 30, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
May 26, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 26, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 26, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 26, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 17, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 17, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 17, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 17, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 17, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 17, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 17, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2017RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 26, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jan 26, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 17, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 25, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2012NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 20128.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Apr 11, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 26, 2012ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2006R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Oct 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 11, 2006CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2006IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Sep 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2006AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 21, 2006EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 18, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance