CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EL POLLO LOCO FLAME-GRILLED MEXICAN CHICKEN

USPTO serial 78732634

EL POLLO LOCO FLAME-GRILLED MEXICAN CHICKEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EL POLLO LOCO FLAME-GRILLED MEXICAN CHICKEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jimmy Chen

Jimmy Chen Rule LegalSuite E41030251 Golden LanternLaguna Niguel, CA 92677

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Franchise services, namely, offering technical and business management assistance in the establishment and operation of restaurantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 19, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 3, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 24, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 24, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 24, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 19, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2006GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Apr 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance