USPTO serial 78732762
AIRDORA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRDORA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Aeris Thermal Technology, Inc.
San Diego, CA
AMULAIRE THERMAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
SAN DIEGO, CA
AMULAIRE THERMAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
SAN DIEGO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allyn Taylor
ALLYN TAYLOR DLA PIPER US LLP2000 UNIVERSITY AVEEAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303-2215UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Heat sinks for use in computers and electronic components; coolers, namely, central processing unit coolers; and heat spreaders for use in computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Thermal interface material, namely, phase change thermal insulation for use between an electronic component and a heat sink to promote thermal transport therebetween | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aeris Thermal Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AMULAIRE THERMAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AMULAIRE THERMAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named AIRDORA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |