USPTO serial 78733221
DRIVEN BY STEEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DRIVEN BY STEEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hamilton, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. LaBarge
RICHARD M LABARGE MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP233 S WACKER DR STE 6300 SEARS TWRCHICAGO, IL 60606-6357UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | steel sheet and strip products, namely, hot-rolled sheet and strip; cold-rolled sheet and strip; galvanized sheet and strip; galvannealed sheet and strip; and painted cold-rolled, galvanized or galvannealed sheet and strip; bar mill products, namely, round and hexagonal bars in straights or coils; rods, square bars, reinforcing bars, bands, flats, angles, and structural steel shapes and steel sections of all kinds; semi-finished steel products, namely, billets, blooms and slabs; coke; chemical products, namely, anhydrous ammonia, benzene, toluene, xylene and coal tar; pig iron; slags, namely, ironmaking and steelmaking slags | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | operation of cokemaking, ironmaking, steelmaking and casting facilities, and rolling and finishing mills; and manufacturing of steel to customer order | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |