Drawing for VIVINOX

USPTO serial 78733416

VIVINOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIVINOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLPLACKENBACH SIEGEL BLDGONE CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006COATED ROLLED STAINLESS STEEL IN PLATE, SHEET, COIL, OR TUBE FORM FOR USE IN CIVIL AND INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS, CONSTRUCTIONS AND INFRASTRUCTURESACTIVE—
040COATING OF STAINLESS STEEL ROLLED PRODUCTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 5, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 5, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance