USPTO serial 78734235
LIGHT WITHOUT LIMITS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- โ
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIGHT WITHOUT LIMITS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burlington, MA
PHILIPS SOLID-STATE LIGHTING SOLUTIONS, INC.
BURLINGTON, MA
Other trademarks owned by PHILIPS SOLID-STATE LIGHTING SOLUTIONS, INC.
Boston, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua S. Jarvis, Esq.
Joshua S. Jarvis, Esq. FOLEY HOAG LLP155 SEAPORT BLVD STE 1600Seaport World Trade Center WestBOSTON, MA 02210-2600Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for use to control the color of artificial light in the field of lighting; instruments and electronic devices, namely, microprocessors, LED lights, circuit boards, power modules, data network computer hardware, transmitters, receivers, computer chips, and integrated circuits, all used to control the color of artificial light | ACTIVE | โ |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Color Kinetics Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by PHILIPS SOLID-STATE LIGHTING SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Color Kinetics Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named LIGHT WITHOUT LIMITS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | โ |
| Oct 14, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | โ |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | โ |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | โ |
| Feb 28, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | โ |
| Feb 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | โ |
| Sep 25, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | โ |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | โ |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | โ |
| Sep 14, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | โ |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | โ |
| May 8, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Mar 12, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | โ |
| Mar 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | โ |
| May 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| May 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| May 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | โ |
| May 24, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | โ |
| May 24, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| May 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | โ |
| Apr 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Oct 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |