Drawing for NAVTEQ ON BOARD

USPTO serial 78734280

NAVTEQ ON BOARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAVTEQ ON BOARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gina L. Durham

Gina L. Durham DLA Piper US LLPP.O. Box 64807Chicago, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Consulting services in the field of software developmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 28, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 18, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 19, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 27, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance