CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for NANOMECH

USPTO serial 78734658

NANOMECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANOMECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William B. Patterson

William B. Patterson Patterson & Sheridan, L.L.P.3040 Post Oak BoulevardSuite 1500Houston, TX 77056

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Microchip components, namely, embedded memory structures and stand-alone memory structures incorporated into microchips; microchips; apparatus and instruments for embedding microchip componentsACTIVE—
010Microchip components for medical use, namely, embedded memory structures and stand-alone memory structures incorporated into microchips; microchips for medical use; apparatus and instruments for embedding microchip components, for medical useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 11, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 11, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 11, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 12, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 25, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance