USPTO serial 78734769
DIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger P. Furey
TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATOR KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP525 W MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60661-3629UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail jewelry and hair accessory stores; retail store, online store, and mail order catalog services featuring jewelry, hair accessories and hairdresser's wares, namely, hair ornaments, hair slides, hair bows, Alice bands, hair grips, hair bands, hair fasteners, hair clips, bun nets, earrings, bracelets, studs, necklaces, rings, chokers, bangles, body jewels, ankle chains, and brooches, all the aforesaid goods being made predominantly of non-precious metals and stones | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 30, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |