USPTO serial 78734854
NANOMETAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NANOMETAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | bicycles, bicycle parts, bicycle bearings, bicycle accessories, boats, personal watercraft, small powerboats, personal jet boats, water scooters, recreational watercraft | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | athletic footware, athletic apparel | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | archery equipment, archery bows, softball bats, softball equipment, golf clubs, golf club shafts, golf club heads, skates ice hockey, skates inline roller, tennis equipment, tennis racquets, racquetball equipment, skateboards, snow ski equipment, ski poles, ski bindings, alpine skis, cross country skis, snowboards, fishing equipment including poles, reels, lines, lures, plugs, water skis, bearings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |