USPTO serial 78735857
KINU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 4, 2007
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with KINU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
Braeside, AU
Braeside, AU
Braeside, AU
HUNTER AMENITIES (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD
BRAESIDE VIC, AU
Other trademarks owned by HUNTER AMENITIES (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD
HUNTER AMENITIES INTERNATIONAL LTD./LES ARTICLES D'ACCUEIL HUNTER
BURLINGTON, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by HUNTER AMENITIES INTERNATIONAL LTD./LES ARTICLES D'ACCUEIL HUNTER
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E. Shapiro
Ronald E. Shapiro Shapiro and Silverstein PLLC11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 740Fairfax, VA 22030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | liquid soap, solid soap, gel soap, bath gel, hair conditioner, hair shampoo, hair care preparations, lotion for care of the skin, cream for care of the skin, all of the above not containing silk | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Concept Amenities Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Concept Amenities Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Concept Amenities Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by HUNTER AMENITIES (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by HUNTER AMENITIES INTERNATIONAL LTD./LES ARTICLES D'ACCUEIL HUNTER
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named KINU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 28, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 25, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2018 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jun 9, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 30, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 4, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |