Drawing for FONTAINEBLEAU

USPTO serial 78736034

FONTAINEBLEAU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FONTAINEBLEAU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bassam N. Ibrahim

Bassam N. Ibrahim Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, PCP.O. Box 1404Alexandria, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Playing cards, gaming equipment, namely, poker chips and game wheels, dice, gaming tables; playing card cases, games and toys, namely toy slot machines and toy banks, plush animals, and jigsaw puzzlesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Oct 13, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Oct 6, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
May 3, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 22, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 27, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Oct 27, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Oct 5, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 3, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Mar 31, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 31, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Mar 31, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 2, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 2, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Oct 2, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 18, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 3, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 3, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 12, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 2, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 2, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 3, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jan 3, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Dec 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 18, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 2, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 2, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Oct 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 25, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 8, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 5, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Dec 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance