Drawing for VACUUM COATING TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 78736426

VACUUM COATING TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VACUUM COATING TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

K. Alison de Runtz

K ALISON DE RUNTZ PARSONS HSUE & DE RUNTZ LLP595 MARKET ST STE 1900SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2894UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Coating machines; vacuum coating machines; sputtering machines; endblocks for coating and sputtering machines; magnetrons; cathodes; rotatable magnetron cathodes; magnetic arrays; parts and fittings for any of the aforementioned goods; user and instruction manuals sold as a unit with any of the aforementioned goodsACTIVENov 9, 2005
009Scanning optical spectrometer for use in connection with measuring the quality of coatings applied to glass; user and instruction manuals sold as a unit with any of the aforementioned goodsACTIVENov 9, 2005
042Research, engineering, design and consultancy services in connection with coating machines, vacuum coating machines, sputtering machines, endblocks for coating and sputtering machines, magnetrons, cathodes, rotatable magnetron cathodes, magnetic arrays, and parts and fittings for any of the aforementioned goodsACTIVENov 9, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 4, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance