USPTO serial 78736542
ADAPTIVE WIRELESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADAPTIVE WIRELESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia Spoor Gard
JULIA SPOOR GARD BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 S MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3506UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | semiconductors; software and software platforms for use in baseband integrated circuits and wireless modems in the field of wireless communications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |