Drawing for PREVENTOR

USPTO serial 78737472

PREVENTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SAPP, HEATHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PREVENTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ann K. Ford

Ann K. Ford DLA Piper LLP (US)500 Eighth ST., NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal window casements, frames, shutters, and sills; metal door casings and frames; metal doors; metal garage doors; metal patio doors; metal sliding doors; metallic fire doors; revolving doors of metalACTIVE
011Shower doorsACTIVE
019Non-metal window casements, frames, shutters and sills; non-metal windows; stained glass windows; plastic security windows allowing communication; vinyl windows; window glass; window panes; wood window frames; door frames, not of metal; door casings, not of metal; non-metal door panels; non-metal doors; non-metal sliding doors; wood door framesACTIVE
040custom manufacture of windows and doors to the specification of othersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 11, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Sep 11, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 17, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Aug 17, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Apr 22, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Apr 22, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 20, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 20, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Oct 20, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 8, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 28, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 28, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 5, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 15, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 31, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 15, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 2, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance