USPTO serial 78737708
AED SENTRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AED SENTRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NORTH MIAMI BEACH, FL
NORTH MIAMI BEACH, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL S. POLLEY, ESQ.
DANIEL S POLLEY ESQ DANIEL S POLLEY PA1215 E BROWARD BLVDFORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | System comprised primarily of computer hardware, computer software programs and databases for tracking and monitoring the operating and location status of automated external defibrillators, automated external defibrillator batteries and automated external defibrillator electrodes; software based system comprised primarily of computer hardware, computer software programs and databases for tracking and monitoring the operating and location status of automated external defibrillators, automated external defibrillator batteries and automated external defibrillator electrodes; system comprised primarily of computer hardware, computer software programs and databases for tracking and monitoring the operating and location status of medical devices, batteries for medical devices and electrodes for medical devices; software based system computer hardware, computer software programs and databases for tracking and monitoring the operating and location status of medical devices, batteries for medical devices and electrodes for medical devices; system comprised primarily of computer hardware, computer software programs and databases for detecting medical emergencies and triggering automated notification alerts for summoning emergency medical assistance; system comprised primarily of computer hardware, computer software programs and databases for detecting medical emergencies and triggering automated notification alerts for summoning emergency medical assistance for suspected sudden cardiac arrest victims; system comprised primarily of computer hardware, computer software programs and databases for permitting potential rescuers to trigger automated notification alerts for summoning emergency medical assistance; system comprised primarily of computer hardware, computer software programs and databases for permitting potential rescuers to trigger automated notification alerts for summoning emergency medical assistance for suspected sudden cardiac arrest victims; system comprised primarily of computer hardware, computer software programs and databases for automatically summoning emergency medical assistance for suspected sudden cardiac arrest victims; system comprised primarily of computer hardware, computer software programs and databases for automatically triggering audible and visual alarms located in close proximity to an automatic external defibrillator; system comprised primarily of computer hardware, computer software programs and databases for providing information about the location of one or more automatic external defibrillators and potential rescuers to public safety answering points; software based system comprised primarily of computer hardware, computer software programs and databases for providing information about the location of one or more automatic external defibrillators and potential rescuers to public safety answering points | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |