USPTO serial 78739299
PARABLE SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PARABLE SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Provider of (through resell) software and hardware solutions and services for managing the network in the areas of performance management, security solutions, compliance, governance, change management, automation and other areas and/or solutions with the goal of improving the operational efficiencies and performance of the network infrastructure and the underlying components, services and applications | ACTIVE | Dec 22, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |