USPTO serial 78739426
CITADEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CITADEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trisha A. Dore
John N. Jennison Jennison & Shultz, P.C.Crystal Plaza #1, Suite `11022001 Jefferson Davis HwyArlington, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | encoded electronic chip bank cards for enabling processing of electronic funds transactions in a secure environment | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | Bank checks for enabling processing of electronic fund transactions in a secure environment | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | Electronic processing services, namely, processing electronic funds transactions in a secure environment | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |