Drawing for IMAGEANALYZER

USPTO serial 78739775

IMAGEANALYZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROMAGHIM, PETER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMAGEANALYZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David M. Ostfeld

DAVID M OSTFELD ADAMS & REESE LLP4400 ONE HOUSTON CNETER, 1221 MCKINNEY4400 ONE HOUSTON CTR 1221 MCKINNEYHOUSTON, TX 77010

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electrical and scientific apparatus, namely, computer software used in verifying the image quality and usability of check images using a variety of configurable tools including legal enhancement of the imageACTIVEJul 20, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 20, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 20, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 3, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 11, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 11, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 11, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance