USPTO serial 78740285
ROUXBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4122303Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 3, 2012
- Examiner
- MACFARLANE, JAMES W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROUXBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rouxbe Video Technologies Inc.
Vancouver, CA
Rouxbe Video Technologies Inc.
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Rouxbe Video Technologies Inc.
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rouxbe Video Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rouxbe Video Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rouxbe Video Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ROUXBE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 29, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 10, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |