USPTO serial 78740735
U4EA EU-PHO-RI-A TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with U4EA EU-PHO-RI-A TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bristol, BS1 6PL, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fred W. Hathaway,
FRED W HATHAWAY BUMS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHIS LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN IMPROVING THE UTILITY, MANAGEABILITY AND PROFITABILITY OF COMPUTER NETWORKS; DIGITAL COMMUNICATION AND TELECOMMUNICATION APPARATUS, NAMELY, SWITCHES, ROUTERS AND NETWORK APPLIANCES, NAMELY GATEWAYS FOR CONVERTING ANALOG TELEPHONY TO VOICE-OVER-INTERNET PROTOCOL, AND INTEGRATED ACCESS DEVICES; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR USE IN IMPROVING UTILITY, MANAGEABILITY AND PROFITABILITY IN RELATION TO THE DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT OF DATA PACKET SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES PROVIDING REAL TIME CONNECTIVITY SERVICES FOR THE TRANSFER OF DATA BETWEEN DEVICES AND DATA AND APPLICATIONS FOR IMPROVING THE UTILITY AND MANAGEABILITY OF COMPUTER NETWORKS ENGAGED IN THE TRANSMISSION OF MULTIPLE TYPES OF DATA TRAFFIC; TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANCY SERVICES, NAMELY, TELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTANCY IN THE HELD OF IMPROVING THE TRANSMISSION OF MULTIPLE TYPES OF DATA TRAFFIC CONCERNING THE DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT OF DATA PACKET SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF DATA NETWORK QUALITY OF SERVICES, NETWORK MANAGEMENT, IMPLEMENTATION AND CONTROL OF COMPUTER NETWORKS, MULTI-SERVICE NETWORKS AND NETWORK RELIABILITY; DESIGN AND TESTING OF NEW PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS; PROVIDING ADVICE, CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION REGARDING TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIELD OF DATA NETWORK QUALITY OF SERVICES, COMPUTER NETWORK MANAGEMENT, IMPLEMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTER NETWORKS, MULTI-SERVICE COMPUTER NETWORKS, COMPUTER NETWORK RELIABILITY, AND REGARDING DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |