USPTO serial 78740999
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RONNIE FISCHER
RONNIE FISCHER BENSON & CASE LLP1660 S ALBION ST STE 1100DENVER, CO 80222-4047UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and business services, namely, business marketing services; mobile and non-mobile retail stores and vendors featuring equipment for use in the preparation, dispensing, and serving of food and beverages; mobile and non-mobile retail stores and vendors featuring beverage products, namely, hot, cold, iced, and semi-frozen beverages made with the base of one or more of the following-- coffee, espresso, tea, cocoa, water, soda, vegetable and fruit juice, powdered flavorings, and flavoring syrups; mobile and non-mobile retail stores and vendors featuring food products, namely hot and cold products including-- sandwiches, cereals, bread, pastries, candy, ices, ice cream and other baked goods made with sauces, spices, sugars, flour, confectionery, chocolate, powdered flavorings, and flavoring syrups; business management consulting with relation to strategy, marketing, production, personnel, and retail sale matters in the field of food and beverage mobile and non-mobile retail stores and vendors; franchising, namely offering technical assistance in the establishment and operation of drive-though/by, take-away food and beverage outlets, and of restaurants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2005 |
| 043 | Hotels and Restaurants; services for providing food and drinks, namely, mobile and non-mobile restaurants and vendors, hot trucks and vans in the nature of mobile restaurant services, cafes, restaurants, snack bars, take out restaurant services, catering services, cafeterias, and self-service restaurants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |