Drawing for DIVA

USPTO serial 78741036

DIVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, GEORGE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel C. DeCarlo

DANIEL C DECARLO LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP221 N FIGUEROA ST STE 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90012-2639UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in imaging, electronically storing and retrieving documentsACTIVESep 9, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 9, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 8, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 14, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 6, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance