Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78741604?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78741604. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns RADIOLOGY IN REALTIME?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78741604, the listed owner(s) include: Dicom Grid, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78741604?

Serial number 78741604 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark RADIOLOGY IN REALTIME. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of RADIOLOGY IN REALTIME?

RADIOLOGY IN REALTIME (78741604) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover RADIOLOGY IN REALTIME?

The public record lists International Classes: 038. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 78741604

RADIOLOGY IN REALTIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Oct 27, 2005
Status date: Jan 5, 2009
Registration date: —
Examiner: HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RADIOLOGY IN REALTIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Dicom Grid, Inc.
Phoenix, AZ
Other trademarks owned by Dicom Grid, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank X. Curci

Frank X. Curci Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, PLC201 E. Washington Street, 11th FloorPhoenix, AZ 85004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
038	Computer aided transmission of information, images and videos; electronic delivery of images, video and photographs via a global computer network; electronic, electric and digital transmission of voice, data, images, video signals and messages; transmission of information, images and video relating to pharmaceuticals, medicine and hygiene; wireless electronic transmission of voice signals, data, facsimiles, images, video and information; online document delivery via a global computer network	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Mar 24, 2009	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Mar 21, 2009	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jan 5, 2009	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jan 5, 2009	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Oct 9, 2008	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Oct 9, 2008	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Oct 9, 2008	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Aug 11, 2008	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jun 12, 2008	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2008	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
May 16, 2008	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
May 16, 2008	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
May 16, 2008	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Apr 29, 2008	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2008	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Apr 3, 2008	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jan 30, 2008	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jan 29, 2008	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Dec 13, 2007	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Dec 13, 2007	COAR	TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED	—
Jul 17, 2007	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Jul 17, 2007	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 21, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 21, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 20, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jun 19, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Nov 30, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 28, 2006	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Nov 2, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Nov 1, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—