Drawing for CRYSTALPURE

USPTO serial 78741754

CRYSTALPURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRYSTALPURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George W. Moxon II

George W. Moxon II Roetzel & Andress, LPA222 S. Main St.Akron, OH 44308UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water filters for pools, spas and water parksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jul 10, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 17, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jun 17, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 21, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Nov 21, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Nov 21, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
May 16, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
May 16, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 14, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 14, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 10, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 10, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 20, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 2, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 10, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 26, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance